000 03186cam a2200373Ii 4500
001 9781315714899
008 180706s2015 enk ob 001 0 eng d
020 _a9781315714899
_q(e-book : PDF)
020 _a9781317502357
_q(e-book: Mobi)
020 _a9781317502364
_q(e-book: ePub)
020 _a9781317502371
_q(e-book: PDF)
020 _z9780415885478
_q(hardback)
020 _z9781138062740
_q(paperback)
024 7 _a10.4324/9781315714899
_2doi
035 _a(OCoLC)905855480
050 4 _aK5210
_b.B76 2015
082 0 4 _a345.02501
_bB877
100 1 _aBrown, Alexander,
_d1974 December 27-,
_eauthor.
_910966
245 1 0 _aHate speech law :
_ba philosophical examination /
_cAlexander Brown.
264 1 _aAbingdon, Oxon ;
_aNew York, N.Y. :
_bRoutledge,
_c2015.
300 _a1 online resource (xvi, 362 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aRoutledge studies in contemporary philosophy ;
_v67
505 0 _a1. Introduction -- 2. Ten clusters of laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech -- 3. Principles of basic morality -- 4. Principles of personal development -- 5. Principles of civic morality -- 6. Principles of cultural diversity -- 7. Principles of political morality -- 8. Principles of balance -- 9. Principia juris -- 10. Toward a theory of principled compromise -- 11. Conclusion.
520 _a"Hate speech law can be found throughout the world. But it is also the subject of numerous principled arguments, both for and against. These principles invoke a host of morally relevant features (e.g., liberty, health, autonomy, security, non-subordination, the absence of oppression, human dignity, the discovery of truth, the acquisition of knowledge, self-realization, human excellence, civic dignity, cultural diversity and choice, recognition of cultural identity, intercultural dialogue, participation in democratic self-government, being subject only to legitimate rule) and practical considerations (e.g., efficacy, the least restrictive alternative, chilling effects). The book develops and then critically examines these various principled arguments. It also attempts to de-homogenize hate speech law into different clusters of laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech, so as to facilitate a more nuanced examination of the principled arguments. Finally, it argues that it is morally fitting for judicial and legislative judgments about the overall warrant of hate speech law to reflect principled compromise. Principled compromise is characterized not merely by compromise over matters of principled concern but also by compromise which is itself governed by ideals of moral duty or civic virtue (e.g., reciprocity, equality, and mutual respect)"--
_cProvided by publisher.
650 0 _aHate speech
_xLaw and legislation.
_910967
650 0 _aHate speech
_xPhilosophy.
_910968
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9780415885478
_w(DLC) 2014040617
830 0 _aRoutledge studies in contemporary philosophy ;
_v67.
_93487
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315714899
_zClick here to view.
942 _cEBK
999 _c3942
_d3942